Sunday, May 17, 2020

Animal Testing Essay - 916 Words

Animal Testing nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;Using Animals for testing is wrong and should be banned. They should be entitled to the rights we have. Every day humans are using defenseless animals for cruel and most often useless tests. The animals cannot fight for themselves therefore we must. There should be stronger laws to protect them from laboratory experiments. nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;Although private companies run most labs, experiments are often conducted by public organizations. The U.S. government, the Army and Air Force in particular, has designed and conducted many animal experiments. The experiments were engineered so that many animals would suffer and die without any certainty that this suffering and death would†¦show more content†¦Also, at the University of Rochester School of Medicine a group of experimenters put fifty beagles in wooden boxes and tested them with different levels of radiation by x-rays. Twenty-one of the dogs died within the first two weeks. The irritated dogs suffered vomiting, diarrhea, and lost their appetites. Later, they hemorrhaged from the mouth, nose, and eyes. In the experimenter’s report, they compared the experiment to others of the same nature, each using about seven hundred dogs. The experimenters said that the injuries produced in their experiments were â€Å"typical of those descr ibed for the dog†. Another inexcusable experiment was conducted by the Food and Drug Administration. They gave thirty beagles and thirty pigs a pesticide in their food, seven days a week for six months, â€Å"in order to insure tissue damage†. Within eight weeks, eleven dogs showed signs of â€Å"abnormal behavior† including nervousness, salivation, muscle spasms, and convulsions. After experimenting with additional twenty beagles, the experiments concluded that massive daily doses of pesticide produce different effects in dogs than they do in pigs. These three experiments, according to reports, obviously caused the animal to suffer greatly before dying. No steps were taken to prevent this suffering, even when it was clear that the radiation or poison made the animals extremely sick. Also,Show MoreRelatedAnimal Testing678 Words   |  3 Pages Animal testing is a controversial topic in today’s society, much more than it was 100’s of years ago. Testing on animals was practiced long ago, and is still practiced today. Greek writings about vivisection [the dissection of a live organism] can be found dated as early as 500 BC. At that time, in Ancient Rome and Alexandria, and later in Greece, vivisection was originally practiced on human criminals, but prohibitions on the mutilation of the human body soon arose. This caused a reliance on animalsRead MoreTesting On Animals : The Dangers Of Animal Testing1375 Words   |  6 Pagesnumber of animals that undergo constant suffering in the name of human vanity. Animal testing was originally introduced in the early 20th century and is still prominent today. It is morally unacceptable to experiment on animals for human purposes. The procedures used in animal testing are cruel and inhumane, nor are they the most reliable source of data; resulting in many mishaps. Moreover , with the perpetual advancements in technology, there are several alternative methods making animal testing unnecessaryRead MoreHuman Testing : The Benefits Of Animal Testing802 Words   |  4 PagesAnimal testing has helped us for years discover cures for sickness in humans and sometimes even animals. But as long as they test the animals humanely, animals can be tortured with pain from the testing. However many efforts are being made to reduce the testing to a minimum. Scientists know that without the tests they wouldn’t know how to check the safety of new drugs. If there was no animal testing scientists would have probably resulted into something very unacceptable, human testing. And scientistsRead MoreThe Cruelty of Animal Testing1644 Words   |  7 PagesAnimal testing is a completely unnecessary act of cruelty and should not be allowed for various reasons. It is superfluous for innocent animals to undergo chemical testing of any sort, not only do they suffer, but there are other more humane alternatives to test products. Many people who are in favor of animal testing do not know of these safer more humane alternatives. Many methods have been developed to help stop animal testing, and improve the health system of all human beings. A significantRead MoreThe Importance Of Animal Testing1240 Words   |  5 Pages Animal testing has long played a part in the science of testing, and it still plays a very important role in the medical world. Testing on animals in order to create a cure for AIDS is one thing, but testing on animals for human vanity is another. Animal testing is used to test the safety of a product. It has kept some very unsafe substances out of the cosmetic world. However, in this day in age, animal testing is not the only way to test the safety of a product. Animal testing in cosmetics hasRead MoreEssay on Animal Testing1383 Words   |  6 Pagesand Behavior Animal testing is not a problem in today’s society because it is beneficial to humans. It seems unethical to put animals through such pain and torture, but if we stopped it completely there would be a large amount of human lives lost. How could this be? The further advancements in medical and technological science is inevitable. Therefore, if the testing must be done to learn more about the brain and body, which spe cies (animals or man) seems expendable for such testing. The real questionRead MoreThe Negatives of Animal Testing1027 Words   |  5 Pageshave been tested on animals; from lipstick and shampoo to dish soap and foot powder. Even the white ink on an MM has been tested on animals. To some, this statement may be alarming and even disturbing – to others it may not mean much at all. Either way, the debate over animal testing has gained much popularity in recent decades. Animal testing has been done since at least 500 BC; even Aristotle experimented on animals for scientific reasoning. Around 200 AD, dissecting animals in public was actuallyRead More Animal Testing Essay710 Words   |  3 Pagesanimal testing â€Å"Beauty without cruelty† is the outcry that can be heard from animal right activists around the world. The FDA does not require companies to perform tests on animals but if the cosmetic product contains chemicals that can be seen as toxins, testing becomes a necessity. There are currently thirteen safety tests that are performed on animals. Anti-testing activists deem these unnecessary and consider them to be cruel. â€Å"Fourteen million animals are used currently in the U.SRead MoreThe Rights Of Animal Testing2041 Words   |  9 Pagesrights of all animals with further argument or debates, do humans have the right to use animals on medical testing and lab use? There are several issues that can be placed in this argument this research will acknowledge four important topics in the rights of animal testing. Is it right to use animals for testing? Is it right to compare animal DNA to human DNA in these animal experiments? Is it right to use real animals instead of computers to generate results? Is it right to state animals are beingRead MoreThe Efficiency Of Animal Testing1394 Words   |  6 PagesEfficiency of Animal Testing For many years, the primary way to make advances in biomedical science was through experimentation on animals, also known as vivisection. This method involves using different species of animals in experiments and developmental procedures to determine toxicity, dosing, and effectiveness of test drugs before proceeding to human clinical trials. However; the use of animals in testing laboratories is becoming less common due to improved alternative options. Animal experimentation

Wednesday, May 6, 2020

An Analysis Of Henrik Ibsen s A Doll House - 1460 Words

There is a problem in present day with regard; towards sexism. Sexism is the act of one gender putting down the opposite gender as inferior. In this topic men putting down women as frail and weak minded. In the early nineteenth century in the United States there are ideas of traditionalism that survive today. Traditionalism is the old belief that all men, notably the oldest should be the head of the household and that women should be homemakers. These ideas of women still being weak mentally have brought great opposition to the idea of a female president. Traditionalist opposition has women body shamed into the fixed standard of beauty being the skinny Caucasian blonde. People still look down on women in troubled relationships as being their fault. Henrik Ibsen’s A Doll House puts into criticism the problems brought by traditionalism though the story between Torvald and Nora. Where Nora has to keep a secret how she saved her husband’s life to save her marriage, because she fears a woman helping a man would shame him into leaving her. Charlotte Perkins Gilman’s short tale â€Å"The Yellow Wallpaper† also criticizes traditionalism and argues the ideals of traditionalism encourage sexism and is damaging towards women. The story is narrated by an unnamed protagonist going through a slow descent into madness through her journal, which insinuates her husband, a physician is encouraging her madness. What these two writings illustrate is that the old traditional beliefs areShow MoreRelatedAnalysis Of Henrik Ibsen s A Doll House 1823 Words   |  8 PagesA Doll House is a play that was written by Henrik Ibsen in 1879. Nora Helmer is a wife and mother who secretly loaned money to save her husband’s, Torvald, life. Torvald views and treats Nora has a doll and she goes along with it. As conflict comes and goes Nora decides that her current life is not what she wants for herself. She no longer wants to be anyone’s â€Å"dollà ¢â‚¬  and decides to leave her family in search of independence. This play was controversial during the time it was written becauseRead MoreAnalysis Of Henrik Ibsen s A Doll House 1152 Words   |  5 PagesHenrik Ibsen’s play â€Å"A Doll House† addresses the importance of the roles women play throughout this time period. Women are thought to be like â€Å"dolls† to their husbands, by obeying their commands and keeping a good image. We see the main character, Nora Helmer struggle to keep her perfect image of a great wife as troubles start to arise. Throughout the play we begin to see Nora push through her troubles and find her true identity, Nora shifts from being the loving, perfect wife, to being a strongRead MoreAnalysis Of Henrik Ibsen s A Doll House884 Words   |  4 Pagestransform minor lies such as white lies into something more dangerous. When one works to conceal a lie, a cloud of deception hangs over those involved and can lead to the destruction of friendships, relationships, and even marriages. In Henrik Ibsen’s A Doll House, he uses the motif of lies and deception to illustrate the fragileness of the Helmer’s marriage, which ultimately leads to its demise. Nora Helmer, a naà ¯ve woman who has never been given the chance to mature into an independent womanRead MoreAnalysis Of Henrik Ibsen s A Doll House995 Words   |  4 Pagesimagining and guiding the integration of all these elements belongs to the director. One of the toughest tasks of a director is to reinvigorate a socially important and renowned production while maintaining its original message and composition. Henrik Ibsen’s A Doll House is a socially important realistic play that portrays the gender dynamics that plagued the nineteenth century and questions the expectations held for women in a household and society. The play is still incredibly influential because the issuesRead MoreAnalysis Of Henrik Ibsen s A Doll House 851 Words   |  4 PagesHenrik Ibsens’s, A Doll House, details the lives of the Helmers, a seemingly perfect couple. As the story progresses from act to act, it becomes quite obvious that their relationship is everything but perfect. Complic ations arise quickly when a forged loan by Nora Helmer is brought to her husband Torvald’s attention. The prejudices women experience, particularly, Nora is a definite tone in this play. Henrick Ibsen does a great job at showing both sides of the oppression of women, particularly withinRead MoreAnalysis Of Henrik Ibsen s A Doll House 1472 Words   |  6 Pages â€Å"A Doll House† Playing many different characters is what Henrik Ibsen’s meant to do in A Doll House. The main characters fool people into believing they are someone other than their true selves. Nora plays her role flawlessly as she pretends to be living two different lives. Nora is Torvalds devoted and self-indulgent wife, but naively enough, she doesn’t realize she is a courageous, self-sufficient women. As the character’s progress so does Nora’s personality, she goesRead MoreAnalysis Of Henrik Ibsen s A Doll House 924 Words   |  4 PagesHenrik Ibsen once wrote a play called â€Å"A Doll House.† Back in 1879 when the play was written there was lots of controversy on whether are not they play should have been showed. It created lots of arguments because of the time that they play was done (Hemmer). In the time frame that Ibsen wrote his play it was a time where women really had no say. Women would listen to their husbands and do as they say. At the end of the original play Nora, the main character, left her husband and her kids. IbsenRead MoreAnalysis Of Henrik Ibsen s A Doll House Essay1971 Words   |  8 PagesIn Hendrik Ibsen play â€Å"A Doll House† Nora is a women who had typical women gender role in the 19th century to take care of the children and the home so that she can please her husband while her husband handles all the outside business and money as the primary care taker. Nora has always lived with a man that took care of her and told her what to do. Nora completely accepted her expectations and â€Å"conditions of the world in which she live† as Torvald put it, because she never had the opportunity toRead MoreAnalysis Of Henrik Ibsen s A Doll House 1154 Words   |  5 Pagessacrifice mean? Is it important? Sacrifice can be defined as an act of immolating someone or something. Will one might think it depends on the person to decide on the importance of the sacrifice? In light of this play, â€Å"A Doll House† written realistically by Henrik Ibsen, he has portrayed many symbols throughout the play. One of the many symbols that stood out was sacrifice. Clothing also symbolized some importance in the play and the Tarantella dance as well. However, what exactly is a symbolRead MoreAnalysis Of Henrik Ibsen s A Doll House Essay981 Words   |  4 Pagestraditional stereotypes, men are strong and dominant, while women are weak and submissive. There are moments in the person’s life when men do not appreciate their wives and go across their limits. This view sounds a lot like what Henrik Ibsen wrote about in his play, A Doll House. Ibsen presented gender roles through social roles, identity and marriage. This factors affect how the characters in the play are viewed by society. Althouth gender roles have changed over time and males and females have become more

An inspector calls written by J. B. Priestley Who is the inspector Essay Example For Students

An inspector calls written by J. B. Priestley: Who is the inspector? Essay The play An inspector calls written by J B Priestley. Inspector Goole is a very mystifying and baffling main character in the play. Who is he and what does he epitomize: is he Eva smith, the voice of the author, the character conscience, god, some one that can foretell the future or is he a ghost. The theme of this short play is that we all have responsibility for ourselves and also for others but also that within society there should be equality. We are immediately drawn to the names Eva Smith and Inspector Goole. Lets firstly take: the name Goole, it suggests that the inspector is ghost like, and goes about inspecting the other characters in very peculiar and curious manner. Eva is very similar to Eve for she was the first woman; Smith is a very common surname. Together the names represent the typical working clad as the inspector says But just remember this, one Eva smith has gone à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢â‚¬Å" but there are millions and millions and millions of Eva Smith and John Smiths still left with us Priestley is showing the Birlings just how there decisions affect other peoples lives, sometimes for the worst sometimes for the good and that as an employer they have responsibility for society. The play is set in 1912 and has a fundamental moral about socialism. This is definitely because J B Priestley was a great socialist; responsibility is often mentioned in the play and a lot of Priestleys views are aired. Birlings remarks such as The Titanic à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢â‚¬Å" she sails next week forty thousand six hundred tons à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢â‚¬Å" forty thousand six hundred tons à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢â‚¬Å" New York in 5 days and every luxury- and unsinkable, absolutely unsinkable Making himself sound so perceptive when to the audience he is such a fool; as the titanic sunk. Priestley depicts Mr Birling in this way because he is such a capitalist and believes in completely the opposite to Priestley. So Priestly had inserted the Inspector in the play to educate the Birlings and Gerald about values of society especially Eric and Shelia whose generation in a few years time will run the businesses of the country, pay the wages, make the laws and making progress in technology and knowledge. Could it be Shelias conscience that is the inspector? For Shelia is very egocentric in the way that she thinks and is often self obsessed. Her behaviour definitely tells you she is insecure and prown to go into strops. Alas her moods can cause others lives to be turned upside down. As was the case when she met Eva Smith. It was around February and Eva was working in a clothes shop called Milwards, she was assisting another member of staff with a dress for a customer; that customer being Shelia. Shelia was in one her moods this was not helped when the other member of staff asked Eva to show the dress to Shelia. She was immediately struck with jealousy and envy for Evas looks as Shelia told the inspector in a rather embarrassed and ashamed tone And it just suited her. She was the right type for it and I was the wrong type This is demonstrating to us how jealous Shelia was of Eva. It displays to the audience Shelias unconfident and insecure personality. Shelia knows shes like this and maybe thats why and invented the inspector to save herself from becoming arrogant, self à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢â‚¬Å" important and judgmental like her parents. The audience can see this coming through in the play especially when she makes statements like But these girls arent cheap labour à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢â‚¬Å" there people This is showing that she is beginning to develop different views to her parents. Bright new day EssayThe inspector continues now with Eric You treated her like an animal, a thing, not a person He used her as an object and treated her inadequately. Shelia is not judged as she judges herself I turned her out of a job. Sadly Mr Croft is not there so he can not be judged so the audience can only be left to wonder how the inspector would have judged him. The inspectors job is done hes made the characters feel ashamed and humiliated. He leaves his exit being rather dramatic, He walks straight out, leaving them staring subdued and wondering. Leaving the characters and the audience to access themselves a question each other and wonder. Could the inspector be a prophet from the future a god like figure? Gerald returns from his breather, with very important news:- That man wasnt a police officer This changes the story, was any of it true as Gerald says We no proof it was the same photograph and therefore no proof it was the same girl. Almost suggesting that the inspector had woven the whole story together rather like a patch work quilt. The Mr and Mrs Birling pus Gerald almost begin to celebrate, congratulating themselves. The younger generation: Eric and Shelia are distressed as Eric says He was our police inspector all right This is really summing up that within society we all have responsibility whether we want it or not and that the inspector has shown the characters hidden colours. Eric persists to make statements much to his fathers annoyance à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‚ ¦Ãƒ ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‚ ¦. the fact remains that I did what I did. And mother did what she did. And the rest of you did what you did to her He is only pointing out the truth, but this is not downing Mr and Mrs Birlings plus Geralds spirits. The telephone rings sharply. There is a moments complete silence. Birling goes to answer it. Yes?. . . . . Mr Birling speaking . . . . . What? à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢â‚¬Å" here- But obviously the other person has rung off. That was the police. A girl has just died à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢â‚¬Å" on her way to the Infirmary à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢â‚¬Å" after swallowing some disinfectant. And a police inspector is on his way here à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢â‚¬Å" to ask some à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢â‚¬Å" questions That was the same way that Eva died. Was the inspector predicting the future and attempting to save the characters from themselves. To get them to know themselves better, and realise that there decisions affect others. So although it is difficult to know who or what the inspector is, we now know that he is an important social figure in the play, and his views on life are important even in todays society. I think this play was written to remind us that we all have responsibility and that we are all equal and what one person does affects what happens around them.